This is the main body!

###
Nature's Optimizing Algorithm

See all *People* →
See all *Terms* →

Terms
# Scale-Free

## 'Scale-free' networks are ones in which identical system structure is observed for any level of network magnification.

`definition/feature.php`

Complex systems tend towards scale-free, nested hierarchies. By 'Scale-free', we mean to say that we can zoom in on the system at any level of magnification, and observe the same kind of structural relations. Thus, if we look at visualizations of the world wide web, we see a few instances of highly connected nodes (youtube), many instances of weakly connected nodes (your mom's cooking blog), as well as a mid-range of intermediate nodes falling somewhere in between. The weakly connected nodes greatly outnumber the highly connected nodes, but the overall statistical distribution of connected vs unconnected nodes follows a power-law distribution. Thus, if we 'zoom in' on any part of the network (at different levels of magnification), we see similar, repeated patterns.

'Scale Free' entities are therefore fractal-like, although scale-free systems generally are about the scaling of connections or flows, rather than scaling of pictoral imagery (which is what we associate with {{fractals}} HANDLEBAR FAIL or objects that exhibit Self Similarity . Accordingly, a pictoral representation of links in the world wide web does not 'look' like a fractal, but its distributions of connections observes mathematical regularities consistent with what we observe in fractals (that is to say, power laws).

A good way to think about this is that, while both scale-free systems and fractals follow power laws distributions, not all power law distributions 'look' like perfect fractals!

At the same time, sometimes the dynamics of scale free networks align with the visuals we consider to be fractal-like. A good example here is the fractal features of a leaf:

*We can think of the capillary network as the minimum structure required to reach the maximum surface area.*

Here, the fractal, scale-free structure of the capillary network allows the most efficient transport of nutrients to all parts of the leaf surface within the overall shortest capillary path length. This 'shortest overall path length' is one of the reasons that we might often see scale-free features in nature: this may well be the natural outcome of nature 'solving' the problem of how to best economize flow networks.

*minimum global path length to reach all nodes*

The two images serve to illustrate the idea of shortest overall path length. If we wish to get resources from a central node to 16 nodes distributed along a surrounding boundary, we can either trace a direct path to each point from the center, or we can partition the path into splitting segments that gradually work their way towards the boundary. While **each individual pathway** from the center to an individual node is longer in the right hand image, the total aggregate of all pathways to reach all nodes from the center is shorter. Thus the image on the right (which shows scale-free characteristics), is the more efficient delivery network.

**Example - Street Networks:**

We should therefore expect to see such forms of scale-free dynamics in other non-natural systems that carry and distribute flows: thus, if we think of size distribution of road networks in a city, we would expect a small number of key expressways carrying large traffic flows, followed by a moderate number of mid-scaled arteries carrying mid-scale flows, then a large number of neighborhood streets carrying moderate flows, and finally a very high number of extremely small alleys and roads that each carry very small flows to their respective destinations.

*mud fractals and street networks*

Fractals, scale-free networks, self-similar entities and power-law distributions are concepts that can be difficult to disambiguate. Not all scale-free networks *look* like fractals, but all fractals and scale-free networks follow power-laws. Finally, there are many power-law distributions that neither 'look' like fractals, nor follow scale-free network characteristics: if we take a frozen potato and smash it on the ground, then classify the size of each piece, we would find that the distribution of smashed potato sizes follows a power law (but is not nearly as pretty as a fractal!). Finally, self-similar entities (like the romanesco broccoli shown below) are fractal-like (you can zoom in and see similar structure at different scales), but are not as mathematically precise fractal.

*credit: Wikimedia commons (Jon Sullivan)*

**Photo Credit and Caption: ** Underwater image of fish in Moofushi Kandu, Maldives, by Bruno de Giusti (via Wikimedia Commons)

**Cite this page:**

Wohl, S. (2019, 11 November). Scale-Free. Retrieved from https://kapalicarsi.wittmeyer.io/definition/scale-free

Scale-Free was updated November 11th, 2019.

This is the feed, a series of related links and resources. Add a link to the feed →

Nothing in the feed...yet.

This is a list of People that Scale-Free is related to.

This is a list of Terms that Scale-Free is related to.

There would be some thought experiments here.

This is on the side!

See all *People* →
See all *Terms* →

Nothing over here yet

This is the feed, a series of related links and resources. Add a link to the feed →

Nothing in the feed...yet.

This is a list of People that Scale-Free is related to.

This is a list of Terms that Scale-Free is related to.

There would be some thought experiments here.

Navigating Complexity © 2021 Sharon Wohl, all rights reserved. Developed by Sean Wittmeyer